MEDIA REVIEW: MATERNAL INSTINCTS

Taylor Parker spent months faking a pregnancy before she brutally murdered 21-year-old Reagan Simmons-Hancock and cut her unborn daughter from her womb; a crime that ultimately landed her on Texas’ death row

Netflix’s latest true-crime documentary is horrifying audiences with a story almost too shocking to be real. Viewers are being introduced to (or possibly revisiting) one of the most truly disturbing true-crime cases in recent memory. The new documentary Maternal Instinct paints a horrifying picture, but the real story behind the film is arguably even more terrifying than what unfolds on screen.

The documentary, directed by Jessica Dimmock and now streaming on Netflix, revisits the 2020 East Texas murder that left a young mother and her unborn daughter dead…and ultimately sent a woman named Taylor Rene Parker to death row.

At the center of the tragedy was Reagan Simmons-Hancock, a 21-year-old newlywed from New Boston, Texas. Reagan was beautiful, kind, bubbly, devoted to her family and excited to welcome her second child. She and her husband, Homer Hancock, were already raising their young daughter, Kynlee, and were preparing for the arrival of baby Braxlynn Sage Hancock.

But Taylor Parker wasn’t a stranger. Los Angeles obtained actual court documents pertaining to the 2020 case.

According to real testimony later summarized by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Parker had photographed Reagan’s engagement photos and wedding, which was also depicted in the documentary. The two women had become acquaintances through the quaint East Texas community, and Reagan trusted her enough to welcome her into her home.

The betrayal would devastate everyone who knew them. And by all outward appearances, Parker seemed to have everything together.

The documentary details how Parker portrayed herself as the daughter of a wealthy East Texas family with oil money and told those around her that she was expecting a baby with her boyfriend, Wade Griffin, a local hog trapper. Friends even threw her a gender reveal party. She posted pregnancy updates online. She picked out baby names and decorated a nursery. She took staged maternity photos with Griffin. Cringe.

Nearly everything was a lie.

Court records show Parker had undergone a hysterectomy years earlier following complications from an ectopic pregnancy, which left her unable to carry another child. Prosecutors proved she spent nearly 10 months maintaining the elaborate pregnancy deception, even purchasing a silicone pregnancy belly, crafting a customized ultrasound image, and convincing her friends and family that she was due to give birth. As the fake due date approached, cracks began to form.

According to court documents, Parker repeatedly changed the story about where she planned to deliver the baby. On the morning of October 9, 2020, she sent Griffin out of town on an errand to Oklahoma before driving instead to Reagan’s home in New Boston. What came next was an act so evil, it’s almost unspeakable.

The court records state Reagan suffered 113 sharp-force injuries, including multiple stab wounds and dozens of incised wounds. She also sustained blunt-force trauma, skull fractures and injuries consistent with strangulation. Prosecutors then explained that Parker then performed what the court described as a “crude C-section” and removed Reagan’s unborn daughter, Braxlynn, from her womb. Devastating. Per the original criminal complaint, the scalpel (the murder weapon), was left at the scene still lodged in Reagan’s neck.

Hours later Parker’s carefully constructed web of lies began to collapse.

A Texas state trooper pulled Parker over after observing her driving erratically. She claimed she had just given birth on the side of the road- she had baby Braxlynn on her lap, with the umbilical cord still attached.

Medical personnel quickly became suspicious. Court documents show that Parker arrived at the hospital with an infant who was pale and unresponsive, while Parker herself showed no signs consistent with having recently delivered a child. Again, an umbilical cord was reportedly hanging from her clothing.

Doctors fought to save Braxlynn’s life.According to the court, the newborn briefly regained a pulse before ultimately dying. Reagan had already been pronounced dead.

Parker was arrested the same day, and her capital murder trial captivated the nation.

Jurors heard testimony about the lengths Parker went to in order to sustain her lies: including fabricating illnesses, exaggerating family wealth and manipulating almost everyone around her. Witnesses described her as charismatic and convincing…someone capable of making almost anyone believe her stories.

In November 2022, a Bowie County jury convicted Parker of capital murder. During the punishment phase, jurors determined she posed a continuing threat to society and sentenced her to death. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals later affirmed both the conviction and sentence. Parker remains incarcerated at the Patrick L. O’Daniel Unit in Gatesville, Texas; one of the few women currently on Texas’ death row.

In a 2025 interview with the New Yorker, Taylor said that until she went on trial, she didn’t think she’d done anything wrong. “I was in a full-on war in my mind. I told myself, ‘You didn’t do what they said. It’s lies’. My realization came when I had to face the autopsy photos. Jesus hit me straight on, flesh to flesh. That courtroom was so silent, but I heard his voice loud and clear. He told me to open my eyes and see reality.”

Netflix’s Maternal Instinct relies heavily on body camera footage, interviews with investigators, family members and those who once considered Parker a friend. But beneath the headlines and courtroom testimony, lies the story of a family forever changed.

Reagan’s daughter, Kynlee, has to grow up without her mother and baby sister. Homer Hancock lost both his wife and unborn child in a single morning. Reagan’s mother, Jessica Brookes, and sister, Emily Shirey, have spent years speaking publicly about their grief and preserving Reagan’s memory. Nearly six years later, the facts remain almost impossible to comprehend: a fake pregnancy, a carefully crafted double life and a crime so unthinkable that it continues to haunt everyone who hears Reagan and Braxlynn’s story...

PENTAGON RELEASES NEW UFO FILES

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Defense has released a new batch of previously classified documents and recordings related to unidentified aerial phenomena, renewing public fascination while offering few definitive answers.

The release, made on June 12, 2026, marks the third installment in an ongoing government effort to declassify decades of material related to what are more commonly known as UFOs. Officials say the disclosure is part of a broader push for transparency, but the contents have largely deepened the mystery rather than resolved it. The newly published archive includes more than 50 documents, along with images, video footage, and audio recordings gathered from multiple federal agencies, including the FBI, CIA, NASA, and the Pentagon itself. These materials span decades, with incidents dating back to the mid-20th century as well as more recent sightings recorded as recently as 2025. 

Among the most widely discussed elements of the release are several videos and eyewitness accounts describing unusual objects moving through the sky in ways investigators cannot readily explain. In one case from July 2025, witnesses in the northeastern United States recorded two bright lights traveling in tandem, moving silently and appearing to remain synchronized throughout their flight. Federal investigators who reviewed the footage noted that the motion did not match known aircraft behavior. 

Another report details an October 2024 sighting in which a luminous object hovered above a body of water for an extended period before disappearing. According to Pentagon descriptions, the object displayed characteristics resembling a “plasma-like sphere,” with the ability to change brightness and shape over time. Observers reported that the object remained stationary for roughly 45 minutes before vanishing without any visible transition or movement typical of conventional flight.

Eyewitness testimony, including statements from federal agents, is also included in the files. In several documented encounters, law enforcement officials described observing groups of glowing orbs moving in coordinated patterns. In one account, an agent recalled watching the lights and asking a colleague, “Are you seeing this?” — a moment that underscores both the unusual nature of the sightings and the uncertainty surrounding them. 

While the imagery and testimony have captured public attention, officials have emphasized that the material does not provide evidence of extraterrestrial activity. Instead, the Department of Defense has repeatedly stated that the cases remain “unresolved,” meaning that investigators lack enough data to determine the origin or nature of the objects. The files are part of a broader initiative known as the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters, or PURSUE, which was launched earlier in 2026. The program aims to centralize and publish government records on unidentified phenomena and make them accessible to the public. Since its launch, the system has received widespread attention, with billions of visits to its online archive, reflecting growing public interest in the topic. 

Defense officials say additional releases are planned in the coming months, as agencies continue reviewing and declassifying historic records. However, analysts note that the current release highlights a persistent challenge: many reported encounters lack sufficient data for conclusive analysis. In some cases, information is incomplete, while in others, it remains partially redacted for national security reasons.

The newly released files also reinforce a pattern previously noted in earlier reports — that many sightings occur near areas of active military operations, where advanced sensors are more likely to capture unusual aerial activity. This concentration has led some experts to suggest that the apparent increase in sightings may partly reflect improved detection capabilities rather than an increase in unknown objects. 

Even so, a portion of the reported incidents continues to defy conventional explanations. While many past cases have eventually been attributed to drones, weather balloons, or equipment anomalies, others remain unexplained due to the speed, movement, or behavior of the objects involved.

For now, officials maintain a cautious position. The Pentagon has not drawn conclusions about the nature of the phenomena, and the released materials offer little clarity beyond documenting the encounters themselves.What the June 2026 release ultimately provides is not confirmation of any single theory, but rather evidence of a continuing uncertainty. Despite decades of observation and advances in surveillance technology, some aerial incidents still fall outside the limits of current understanding. As additional files are expected to be made public, both investigators and the public remain focused on the same question: whether further disclosures will bring answers—or simply more evidence of phenomena that remain unexplained....

THE TRAGEDY OF RACHEL NICKELL

The murder of Rachel Nickell—the young mom stabbed to death in Wimbledon Common in front of her toddler—made headlines for years until her killer was unmasked more than a decade after her death.

Now, the heartbreaking story is being thrust into the spotlight once again in Netflix’s The Murder of Rachel Nickell—but there are some details left out of the documentary about the man falsely accused of the murder and the convicted killer’s earliest brushes with the law.

Nickell was just 23 when she took her son Alex Hanscombe, 2, to Wimbledon Common on July 15, 1992 to spend the day at the park. While there, a man viciously attacked the young mother, throwing Hanscombe to the ground and then stabbing her more than 40 times.

“It really was the worst crime scene. It just looked like a frenzied attack,” Met Police forensic detective Ron Turnbill recalled in the documentary. “The victim had been attacked, dragged, stabbed 49 times in and around the neck and chest area and she lay with her hands sort of up in front of her face as if she was still trying to protect herself. It was monstrous."

Nickell was just 23 when she took her son Alex Hanscombe, 2, to Wimbledon Common on July 15, 1992 to spend the day at the park. While there, a man viciously attacked the young mother, throwing Hanscombe to the ground and then stabbing her more than 40 times.

“It really was the worst crime scene. It just looked like a frenzied attack,” Met Police forensic detective Ron Turnbill recalled in the documentary. “The victim had been attacked, dragged, stabbed 49 times in and around the neck and chest area and she lay with her hands sort of up in front of her face as if she was still trying to protect herself. It was monstrous.”

Hanscombe was found, caked in mud and blood, clinging to his mother’s lifeless body. While Nickell’s numerous wounds have been well documented, there’s one heartbreaking detail that has garnered less attention.

When Nickell’s body was discovered, she was found with a tiny piece of paper placed on her forehead, according to The Guardian. Her son had placed it there as a makeshift bandaid in the hopes of fixing his mother, as he clung to her body and cried, “Get up mummy.”

Less than a year after the slaying, Colin Stagg became a suspect after he allegedly resembled a sketch created from Hanscombe’s description of the killer, per the documentary.

Stagg was charged in 1993, per The Guardian, but the case against him collapsed months later after Justice Ognall condemned the police for setting a honey trap that resulted in “deceptive conduct of the grossest kind.”

Police had used an undercover officer to write Stagg sexually intimate letters under the name “Lizzie James” in a misguided effort to get him to confess to the murder, according to The Independent. Stagg—who spent a year behind bars before he was ultimately ruled out as the killer—never made any admission to link him to the crime.

In 2008, he was received a settlement of nearly $1 million for the damage the false accusation caused to his life.

At the time, his attorney Alex Tribick told The Guardian, “Colin is realistic enough to realize and accept that his name, no matter what happens, will always be synonymous with the tragic events of Rachel Nickell's death.”

Despite his case being thrown out in court, Stagg remained under public scrutiny for years. In 1995, while in Wimbledon Common—the same park where Nickell was murdered—he pulled an axe on someone during a fight, according to The Independent.

“His life, in short, was a complete and utter misery," his attorney Ian Ryan said at the time. "He lost his sense of reality.”

Stagg was ultimately sentenced to 12 months probation after pleading guilty to threatening behavior and possessing an offensive weapon, per The Guardian.

Nickell’s murder was linked to rapist and convicted killer Robert Napper in 2004 after DNA advances linked Napper to the scene through a crime database, according to the documentary.

At the time, Napper was already serving time in a psychiatric hospital for the 1993 murders of Samantha Bissett, 27, and her daughter Jazmine, 4. Bissett was discovered stabbed and mutilated on the couch of her home, while her young daughter had been sexually assaulted, killed, and hidden under a duvet in a bedroom, according to the documentary.

The victims were discovered by Bissett’s boyfriend Conrad Ellam, according to The Independent.

"The first thing I saw was a stain on the carpet, which turned out to be Sam's blood," he recalled. "I couldn't tell so I thought Jazmine had knocked paint over.”

He then stumbled upon Bissett’s body in the living room, before going in search for her daughter.

"I couldn't really understand it all,” he said of the murders. “I don't know how you're supposed to react to something like that."

Napper admitted to killing Bissett and her daughter in October 1995 on the grounds of diminished responsibility, per The Independent. That same year, he admitted to another rape and two attempted rapes.

The grisly crime was detailed in The Murder of Rachel Nickell—but Nickell and Bissett weren’t the only young mothers to have been targeted.

Just seven weeks before Nickell’s death another 22-year-old mother had been walking with her 2-year-old daughter in a stroller through southeast London when someone grabbed her from behind and put a ligature around her neck, The Guardian reported.

The woman—identified in the news outlet only as “C”—was stripped, raped and beaten as her young daughter watched.

“I asked him not to kill me,” the woman said, per The Guardian. “He didn't stop hitting me. He put a rope around my neck and kept bashing me on the head.”

While the victim survived, Nickell and Bissett did not have the same fate.

Napper was later linked to the Green Chain rapes through DNA, The Guardian reported. Napper had a long string of criminal history before his arrest. According to The Guardian, he grew up watching his father abuse his mother and was assaulted by a family friend during a camping trip at the age of 12.

He was arrested for the first time in 1986 for being in possession of an airgun. Not long after, he allegedly confessed to his mother that he raped a woman on Plumstead Common. Although she called the police to report the attack, police could not find any evidence and let the matter drop, the outlet reported. However, there had been a 31-year-old woman raped in front of her children by a masked intruder eight weeks earlier, per The Guardian.

Then, over a two-month period in 1992, three other women—including “C”—were attacked along Green Chain Walk.

When Napper’s neighbors suggested him as a possible suspect in the Green Chain rapes, police questioned him and asked for a blood sample, but he failed to ever provide one. He was eventually dismissed as a possible suspect because he was taller than the description provided of the attacker, per The Guardian.

Napper was also accused of stalking someone in October 1992. During a search of his home, police found two knives, a crossbow, .22 pistol and notes describing how to restrain someone, maps and a fitness card belonging to a young woman, the outlet reported. He later pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm and ammunition.

Metropolitan Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick said in a statement in 2010 that police planned to offer an apology to Hanscombe and his father Andre Hanscombe for not doing more to stop Napper before Nickell’s killing.

"The Met has accepted that more could, and should have been done,” Dick said per the BBC, “and had more been done we could have been in a better position to have prevented very serious attacks by Napper.”

NEWS UPDATE: MORE FROM THE CRASH

The father of Mackenzie Shirilla — the young woman at the center of the new Netflix true crime documentary The Crash — will not return to his job as a teacher at an Ohio school after his comments on the show.

Steve Shirilla, an art and digital media teacher at Mary Queen of Peace School, will not return to his former role after being placed on administrative leave for showing what the school deemed to be "poor judgement," according to Fox 8.

“We are investigating allegations made on social media that one of our teachers has demonstrated poor judgement," the school said in an email in May. The email did not include the elder Shirilla's name, but he confirmed to 19 News it was him.

Mackenzie Shirilla — dubbed "hell on wheels" by the judge presiding over her case — was convicted of double murder for intentionally accelerating her car at 100 miles per hour into a brick building, killing both her boyfriend, Dominic Russo, and their friend Davion Flanagan in July 2022. She survived the incident and insisted that she blacked out, but evidence presented to a court convinced the jury that she had intentionally wrecked her car with the intention of killing the two young men.

Steve Shirilla appeared on camera for the documentary — which focused on the crash, investigation and trial — and commented on his daughter’s lifestyle and relationship with Russo and Flanagan.

During one interview segment, he appears to brush off his daughter’s cannabis use prior to the deadly collision, despite her only being 17 at the time.

“I don't have a problem with her smoking dope. If you're going to smoke a drug, that's the one I believe you should take,” he said.

In an interview with TMZ earlier this week, he claimed that he wouldn’t return to the school, even if he was asked.

"I wouldn’t re-sign a contract with them for the simple fact of how they handled this situation… the school and the diocese showed their true colors," Shirilla said.

He also told the outlet that he didn't want to discuss his employment situation and reiterated his belief that his daughter is innocent.

"I’m done talking about this or anything that’s not about the injustice my daughter has been put through my only focus is her," he said.

The Independent has requested comment from the school.

Shirilla has been sentenced to two concurrent 15 year to life sentences for the deaths of Russo and Flanagan...

THE HISTORY OF LOCH NESS: FACT, FOKELORE, AND THE MAKING OF A LEGEND

Carved deep into the rugged landscape of the Scottish Highlands, Loch Ness is far more than a body of water. Stretching more than 23 miles and plunging to depths greater than any other lake in Britain, it is a place where geology, human history, and myth have intertwined for thousands of years. While today the loch is known worldwide for its most famous resident—the elusive Loch Ness Monster—its true story is just as compelling.

Loch Ness owes its existence to immense geological forces that shaped Scotland long before humans arrived. The loch sits along the Great Glen Fault, a massive fracture in the Earth’s crust formed over 400 million years ago. This fault line runs diagonally across Scotland, and during the last Ice Age, advancing and retreating glaciers deepened the valley, leaving behind a long, narrow basin once the ice melted. Unlike many Scottish lochs, Loch Ness rarely freezes due to its depth and volume. Its dark, peat‑stained waters—colored by organic matter flowing from the surrounding hills—reduce visibility to just a few feet, a characteristic that would later play a key role in fueling mystery and speculation.
Early Inhabitants and Sacred Waters

Human history along the shores of Loch Ness stretches back at least 6,000 years. Neolithic peoples settled nearby, leaving behind traces of stone tools and burial sites. Later came the Picts, a tribal Celtic people who dominated northern Scotland during the Iron Age and early medieval period.

The Picts regarded animals as powerful spiritual symbols, and carvings found throughout the Highlands depict creatures that some modern observers find suggestively serpentine or aquatic. While there’s no solid evidence these images were linked to Loch Ness specifically, they hint at a long tradition of reverence—or fear—associated with water and the unknown.

One of the earliest written references connected to the loch dates to the 6th century. In The Life of St. Columba, written by Adomnán around 697 CE, the Irish missionary saint is said to have encountered a “water beast” in the River Ness. According to the account, Columba repelled the creature with a prayer, saving a local man. Though firmly rooted in religious storytelling, the episode is often cited as the first known “sighting” of something unusual in the Ness waters.

Throughout the Middle Ages, Loch Ness became an important strategic corridor. Its location within the Great Glen made it a natural route for travel and trade across the Highlands. Castles sprang up along its shores, most famously Urquhart Castle, whose ruins still stand today. Urquhart Castle witnessed centuries of clan warfare, shifting allegiances, and uprisings, including the Wars of Scottish Independence and later Jacobite rebellions. By the late 17th century, the castle was deliberately destroyed to prevent its use by government forces, leaving behind the evocative ruins that now overlook the loch.

Despite centuries of folklore, Loch Ness did not become an international sensation until the 20th century. In 1933, following the construction of a new road along the loch’s northern shore, a local couple reported seeing a large creature cross the road and disappear into the water. Newspapers picked up the story, and “Nessie” was born.

The following year produced the famous “Surgeon’s Photograph,” supposedly showing a long‑necked creature rising from the loch. Though later revealed to be a hoax, the image cemented the monster’s place in popular culture. Sightings multiplied, expeditions were launched, and sonar scans and underwater cameras were deployed in search of proof.

While no conclusive evidence has ever emerged, scientists have offered more grounded explanations for sightings: swimming deer, seals, large fish, floating logs, unusual wave patterns, and optical illusions heightened by the loch’s murky water.

In recent decades, Loch Ness has continued to attract scientific interest. Geological surveys have mapped its depth in detail, while modern studies—including environmental DNA sampling—have catalogued the life within its waters. These studies have confirmed what locals long suspected: Loch Ness contains far less biological variety than one might expect from such a massive body of water. Yet the absence of a monster has done little to diminish the loch’s appeal. The legend endures not because of scientific certainty, but because it taps into something timeless—the human fascination with mystery, with places where the unknown still feels possible.

Today, Loch Ness is one of Scotland’s most visited destinations, drawing travelers eager to explore its history, walk its rugged trails, and gaze into its dark waters in quiet anticipation. Whether or not a monster ever lurked beneath the surface, the real history of Loch Ness is rich enough to stand on its own: a story shaped by ancient geology, early spiritual beliefs, medieval conflict, and modern myth‑making. In the end, Loch Ness reminds us that history is not only recorded in books and ruins, but also in the stories we tell—and continue to tell—about the landscapes that inspire wonder...

THE TRUE STORY OF THE HAWTHORNE HILL SHOOTING

What Happened at Hawthorne Hill? Dressage trainer Michael Barisone pulled a gun on his student at his New Jersey training facility in August 2019. In August 2019, a confrontation inside a quiet New Jersey horse barn ended in two gunshots and later, national headlines.

Olympic dressage coach Michael Barisone shot his student and tenant, Lauren Kanarek, twice in the chest at his Long Valley training facility, Hawthorne Hill. She survived. He was arrested and charged with attempted murder. Nearly three years later, a jury found Barisone not guilty by reason of insanity after hearing 11 days of testimony about a relationship that had deteriorated long before the shooting. He was also acquitted on weapons counts.

Kanarek moved to Hawthorne Hill in 2018 with her partner, Rob Goodwin, to train under Barisone and board her horse on the property. At the time, Barisone was one of the most recognizable figures in American dressage. He had competed internationally and coached riders at the Olympic level, so training with him offered access to a small and competitive world. It isn’t uncommon for riders to live where they train at this high level; coaches sometimes serve as instructors, landlords and gatekeepers all at once.

According to a criminal complaint, police responded multiple times to what officers described as “landlord-tenant related issues” at the property in the months before the shooting. By mid-2019, the tension between Barisone and Kanarek moved online. Kanarek posted videos describing alleged harassment and surveillance at the farm. She called Barisone "racist, homophobic" and "antisemitic" online, allegations he denied. Barisone later argued those posts contributed to what his attorneys described as mounting psychological strain.

In a new documentary about the case, Kanarek said the conflict centered on harassment, bullying and an abuse of power. Barisone told investigators he felt threatened and pressured to remove the couple from the property following a fire inspection. His legal team later argued those pressures contributed to a mental health crisis.

On August 7, 2019, gunshots rang out on the property. Police were dispatched to Hawthorne Hill shortly after 2 p.m. and found Kanarek with multiple gunshot wounds to the chest. According to the criminal complaint, she identified Barisone as the shooter during a 911 call, telling authorities, “Michael Barisone shot me” and “He shot me twice.” Goodwin tackled Barisone during the confrontation, investigators said. As officers removed Barisone from the scene, he reportedly said, “I had a good life.” Kanarek survived after emergency surgery.

At trial, Barisone’s attorneys did not dispute that he fired the gun. Instead, they argued he was temporarily insane at the time of the shooting. Barisone later said he had “zero” recollection of pulling the trigger. Prosecutors argued the evidence pointed to intentional violence after months of escalating conflict. Jurors heard testimony about repeated disputes on the property and reviewed police responses to earlier incidents. They also examined Kanarek’s videos and social media posts. Coverage at the time described the dispute as unusually prolonged and tense, and the conflict between Barisone and his tenants created a “toxic atmosphere” at the farm in the weeks before the shooting.

 An expert called by the prosecution, John Jay College of Criminal Justice psychology professor Dr. Louis Schlesinger, testified there had been “interpersonal problems” and a “longstanding conflict” between Barisone, Kanarek and her partner before the shooting.

After about 18 hours of deliberation, a New Jersey jury found Barisone not guilty by reason of insanity on charges related to the shooting of Kanarek. He was also acquitted of charges tied to Goodwin. The verdict meant jurors accepted that Barisone fired the gun but concluded his mental state prevented him from forming criminal intent under New Jersey law.

He was sent to the Ann Klein Forensic Center in Trenton, N.J., for 30 days for psychiatric treatment following the ruling. Kanarek survived the shooting but suffered life-threatening injuries to her left lung that required extensive medical care and landed her in a medically induced coma. As of 2023, she’d begun riding horses again.

In December 2025, the U.S. Equestrian Federation deemed Barisone permanently ineligible to partake in the sport due to sexual harassment and emotional misconduct...

THE CRASH DOCUMENTARY AND WHAT THEY DIDN'T SHOW

Netflix's new true crime documentary The Crash has reignited the debate around Mackenzie Shirilla, who was convicted of killing her boyfriend Dominic Russo and their friend Davion Flanagan in a 2022 crash.

Since its debut on May 15, both true crime obsessives and curious onlookers have dissected the doc, which revisits the devastating case and its aftermath. The Crash also includes the first on-camera interview with Shirilla, who is now serving two concurrent life sentences in Ohio.

According to prosecutors, a 17-year-old Shirilla intentionally crashed her car into the side of a brick building on the morning of July 31, 2022, in an effort to harm Russo. Shirilla maintains her innocence and claims to have no recollection of the event, which she believes happened as a result of POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome), a medical condition that can cause dizziness and fainting.

The Crash introduces additional evidence and gives Shirilla and her family a chance to tell their side of the story, for better or worse. But the documentary is also receiving criticism for leaving out what many believe to be important information about the case.

Here are some of the items that were left out:

1. Shirilla may have asked her mom to tell police she had a seizure

The Crash isn’t the first documentary about Shirilla's case, which was previously featured in a season 4 episode of the docuseries Killer Cases. The episode, titled “Murder on Wheels,” includes audio recorded by Det. Zaki Hazou, who visited Shirilla in the hospital where she was airlifted after the crash.

“The detective, he did record maybe a few minutes, just audio of her interacting with the detective and her mother," explains lead prosecutor Tim Troup, noting that Shirilla's mother, Natalie, was present. Hazou can be heard telling Shirilla that the police are investigating the incident as "an aggravated vehicular homicide times two," referring to the deaths of Russo and Flanagan. Shirilla interjects and asks, in reference to her mother, "Can I say something to her real quick?" The detective agrees.

Shirilla then speaks to her mother in what Troup describes as "a gibberish or a distortion of the English language. It's kind of like Pig Latin."

It's unclear what Shirilla is saying to her mother, but Troup believes she asks, "Can we tell the police I had a seizure? Can we tell the police something like that?" Shirilla can also be heard asking the detective, "Can't you just take my license away for like, 10 years?"

According to court documents, first responder Brett Stanislaw testified that Shirilla's "pulse, motor, and sensation in her four extremities" were all normal when he arrived on the scene, which "ruled out a stroke, seizure or other significant neurological emergency."

Stanislaw also acknowledged that Shirilla could have had a seizure before medical personnel arrived and "there would be no signs of it” during the evaluation. He noted that her blood oxygen level was "extremely low" and indicative of someone who "just went into cardiac arrest or just came back out of cardiac arrest."

2.  Shirilla allegedly drove the route of the crash in the days leading up to the incident

The Crash also omits one of the most hotly debated pieces of evidence in the case. Per court documents, GPS data from Shirilla's phone shows that she was in the area of the crash, at the intersection of Progress and Alameda, on July 28, 2022, just three days before the incident.

This detail is explored in a season 2 episode of the true crime docuseries Mean Girl Murders, titled "Under the Influence." The GPS data from July 28 is presented as evidence that Shirilla was conducting a "dry run" a few days before the crash. Prosecutor Troup appears in this series as well and says he believes "Mackenzie knew exactly what she was going to do" when she turned onto Progress.

The intersection in question is located in an industrial office park in Strongsville, Ohio. In court, Detective Hazou conceded that GPS data from cellphones is approximate, so it's possible that Shirilla was not at that exact intersection on July 28.

In its determination, the court referred to that stretch of road as an "obscure route" and said it was "not routinely taken" by Shirilla, though there doesn't appear to be additional evidence suggesting that she had or had not taken the route prior to July 28.

During the trial, Michael Galassi, the first officer to respond to the scene, testified that the route is a known "cut-through" to avoid traffic, and that drivers often exceed the speed limit when taking it.

3. Shirilla was the only one in the car wearing a seatbelt

Mean Girl Murders includes an additional detail left out of The Crash: Shirilla was wearing a seatbelt.

"She did have airbags, and the primary impact was on the passenger side of the car," Troup says. "She was incredibly lucky to be alive. Anybody would be lucky to be alive from a crash of this magnitude."

It's a conspicuous detail to some, as Det. Hazou testified that he reviewed Shirilla's social media and "documented over a hundred instances" of "distracted or reckless driving."

Russo and Flanagan were not wearing seatbelts, Troup confirms, adding that "the destruction on especially the passenger side of the car was so bad that airbags would have been almost useless" and "they couldn't have survived."

4. Russo's sister says Shirilla's mom lied about her daughter's condition

The Russo family initially believed the crash was an accident, and tried to check on Shirilla in the days following the incident.

"We thought it was an accident for a while, and we were really, really worried about Mackenzie and how she was doing," Russo's sister Christine said on a recent episode of her podcast. Christine claimed that Shirilla's mom, Natalie, lied to their family about Mackenzie's condition. "We were seeing how she was for about three days," Christine said. "For three days, her mother told us that she was unconscious and hadn't woken up."

She continued, "Natalie told me, my dad and my sister for days that [Mackenzie] was unconscious... And now looking back, she was waiting to form her story."

According to NBC News, Shirilla was unconscious when she was discovered by first responders, but there is no documentation showing she remained unconscious. In his testimony, first responder Officer Michael Galassi said it wasn't until he heard "mumbling" that he realized someone in the vehicle was still alive. One of the first things Shirilla said at the scene was, "How is Davion?"

Shirilla was also conscious when Det. Hazou visited the hospital and recorded her speaking "gibberish" with her mother.

A lawyer for Shirilla did not immediately respond when we reached out for comment...